Clip: "I have spoken with many young academics who say that their theoretical training has left them benumbed. After a few years in the profession, they can hardly locate the part of themselves that can be moved by a poem or novel. It is as if their souls have gone into hiding, to await tenure or some other deliverance."
Seek Giacometti’s “The Palace at 4 a.m.” Go back two hours. See towers and curtain walls of matchsticks, marble, marbles, light, cloud at stasis. Walk in. The beggar queen is dreaming on her throne of words…You have arrived at the web home of Marly Youmans, maker of novels, poetry collections, and stories, as well as the occasional fantasy for younger readers.
Pages
- Home
- Seren of the Wildwood 2023
- Charis in the World of Wonders 2020
- The Book of the Red King 2019
- Maze of Blood 2015
- Glimmerglass 2014
- Thaliad 2012
- The Foliate Head 2012
- A Death at the White Camellia Orphanage 2012
- The Throne of Psyche 2011
- Val/Orson 2009
- Ingledove 2005
- Claire 2003
- The Curse of the Raven Mocker 2003
- The Wolf Pit 2001
- Catherwood 1996
- Little Jordan 1995
- Short stories and poems
- Honors, praise, etc.
- Events
SAFARI seems to no longer work
for comments...use another browser?
Tuesday, December 08, 2015
Teeny note: recommended
If you have an interest in literature, what's happened to English studies in post-post-modern period, and the soul-sucking ideas some mainstream professors might be inculcating in our children, you might just take a look at Lisa Riddick's article at The Point, "When Nothing is Cool."
3 comments:
Alas, I must once again remind large numbers of Chinese salesmen and other worldwide peddlers that if they fall into the Gulf of Spam, they will be eaten by roaming Balrogs. The rest of you, lovers of grace, poetry, and horses (nod to Yeats--you do not have to be fond of horses), feel free to leave fascinating missives and curious arguments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around that article in its entirety, but I think its author is on to something; there are glimpses of awful truths in't. A few influential medieval-lit scholars have embraced "object-oriented ontology," arguing that we've accorded undue privilege to the perspective of human beings rather than, say, that of boulders or other inanimate objects. These humans admit that it's literally an anti-humanist approach.
ReplyDeleteBut then that's the thing: if you study medieval literature, you may be reluctant to admit that you discern kindred spirits in it, lest your peers suspect you of finding a worthy nugget of humanity amid the persecution, anti-Semitism, misogyny, fanaticism, and Islamophobia; deriving pleasure from the awful past simply isn't an option. It does help explain, though, why I see quite a few grad students and young scholars pursuing fan activities and side publications in pop-culture studies with more genuine fervor than the work they supposedly plan to build careers around. What a strange, sad time for the humanities.
"Glimpses of awful truths": yes. Everything you say here makes sense to me. And it is strange and sad.
DeleteI think she did a good job of being lucid and reasonably tactful, which must have been a challenge. She did not mention how much some of these attitudes can stress a young man or young woman of 18, sitting in a college classroom. But I've noticed that among young people as well.
The Ontological Truth of Boulders in the Medieval World!
I was lucky to be in a graduate program that was only beginning to be transformed from a mix of literary historical focus and exegesis in the style of the New Critics.
ReplyDeleteAnd I find that a bad memory is extremely helpful in the matter of theory. I have jettisoned great swaths of reading that way.